Toyota Celica vs Honda Civic (Video)

Piques-2007 elimacion : Toyota Celica vs Honda Civic

Toyota Land Cruiser turn over by russian VAZ

Who will win in the battle 20 year old russian car or new japanese jeep?

from here

Toyota Camry Overview

When Toyota redesigned the current Camry midsize sedan for the 2002 model year, the TV commercials took an oooooh, aaaaaah, styling-that-moves-you approach. After a while they stopped that. It turned out U.S. consumers weren't particularly moved by the styling. It was different, yes, but still conservative - some would say bland, boring.

This didn't stop the Camry from being the best-selling car in the country for the intervening years. But there's tough competition in the field, and it's now clear that bold styling sells. Bland may now be riskier than taking a chance on a strong design statement. Finally, Toyota has heard the call.

The 2007 models hit dealerships in March 2006 equipped with upgraded drivetrains and other refinements. Roughly three months later, hybrid versions built right here in the U.S. hit the streets. The trim levels, in ascending value, are CE, LE, the sporty SE and the premium XLE.

Unfortunately, the Camry Hybrid follows the current formula: It's a hybrid equivalent of the Camry's top, XLE, trim level. So first you have to pony up the cash for the most expensive trim, then pay whatever premium is on top of that for the hybrid aspect. Someday hybrid technology will be a drivetrain option on any trim level, but not until costs come down dramatically.

Utility
Neither the Toyota Camry nor the typical midsize sedan has a marked advantage regarding seating capacity. The Camry outpulls the typical midsize sedan by a sizeable margin.

Dimensions
The typical midsize sedan is a tad heavier than the Toyota Camry. The average midsize sedan's tank is about the same size as the Toyota Camry's, though the Toyota Camry's is a little more capacious. The Camry and the typical midsize sedan compete for the same parking spaces.

Convenience
The average midsize sedan's fuel tank will need to be replenished more often than the unit in the Toyota Camry.

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs about the same to get the Toyota Camry to the dealership as the average midsize sedan. There honestly isn't much of a difference in gas mileage here, but if you must know, the Toyota Camry is slightly more economical than the average midsize sedan. The typical midsize sedan won't tax your gas budget considerably more than the Camry will. In terms of MSRP, the typical midsize sedan doesn't cost much less than the Toyota Camry.

Handling
The Toyota Camry and the typical midsize sedan have roughly comparable tires. With their comparable turning radiuses, the Camry and the average midsize sedan quite certainly handle about the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Camry and the typical midsize sedan have similar-sized engines, with a slight advantage to the typical midsize sedan. Torque is the force that lets you accelerate quickly, and in this respect, the typical midsize sedan is markedly more powerful than the Camry.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota Camry offers a bit more head room than the average midsize sedan, there honestly isn't much of a difference. The Toyota Camry is not particularly roomier for your passengers than the typical midsize sedan.

Overview
The basic warranty that comes with the Toyota Camry isn't quite as generous as the average midsize sedan's.

from here

Toyota Corolla vs. Toyota Camry

Utility
Neither the Toyota Corolla nor the Toyota Camry has a marked advantage with respect to seating capacity. Towing is substantially more the Toyota Camry's forte than it is the Toyota Corolla's.

Performance
Both the Corolla and the Camry are likely to feel a little slow because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio.

Dimensions
Both the Toyota Corolla and the Toyota Camry are likely to feel a tad slow because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio. Your wallet will hurt more every time you fill up the Toyota Camry than the Toyota Corolla because of its more capacious tank. The Corolla and the Camry compete for the same parking spaces.

Cost
The Toyota Corolla is markedly less costly than the Camry in terms of MSRP. The Camry will cost you a bunch of money in gasoline every year compared to the Corolla.

Handling
The Toyota Camry and the Toyota Corolla have roughly similar tires. With their similar turning radiuses, the Corolla and the Toyota Camry indubitably handle approximately the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Camry has a bigger engine than the Toyota Corolla. Remember that smaller engines typically get better gas mileage, but a smaller engine usually has to work a little harder. The Camry packs quite a wallop compared to the Corolla in terms of torque, which is the force that lets you accelerate quickly.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota Corolla offers a bit more head room than the Toyota Camry, there honestly isn't much of a difference. The ampler interior dimensions of the Toyota Camry make it markedly roomier for your passengers than the Corolla.

Overview
The Camry and the Corolla have the same basic after-sale protection.

from here

Toyota Yaris

Toyota's second-generation Yaris compact car is set to go on sale in the U.S. in spring 2006 as a 2007 model. Serving as a replacement for the automaker's Echo, the Yaris will be available in two-door-hatchback or sedan form. It will be Toyota's most affordable car in the U.S. market, according to the automaker. Now in its second generation, the Yaris has been sold in Europe since 1999.

The Yaris' hatchback design recalls the xA, a car built by Toyota's Scion brand. Styled in Europe, the Yaris has short overhangs, a forward-swept rear hatch and a snub nose.

A 1.5-liter four-cylinder that produces 106 hp and 103 pounds-feet of torque (preliminary specifications) powers the Yaris. Either a four-speed automatic or five-speed manual transmission can be installed.

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs approximately the same to get the typical subcompact hatchback to the dealership as the Toyota Yaris. The typical subcompact hatchback consumes a lot of gas compared to the Toyota Yaris. With respect to MSRP, the Toyota Yaris doesn't cost much less than the typical subcompact hatchback. With respect to final price, the typical subcompact hatchback doesn't cost much less than the Toyota Yaris.

Utility
The Yaris and the typical subcompact hatchback can accommodate the same number of passengers.

Convenience
You'll indubitably take the average subcompact hatchback for a fill-up about as often as the Toyota Yaris.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the typical subcompact hatchback offers a bit more head room than the Yaris, there really isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the typical subcompact hatchback offers a bit more head- and leg-room than the Toyota Yaris, there really isn't much of a difference.

Dimensions
The typical subcompact hatchback is a bit more ponderous than the Yaris. The Yaris's tank is approximately the same size as the average subcompact hatchback's, though the typical subcompact hatchback's is somewhat larger. The average subcompact hatchback and the Toyota Yaris compete for the same parking spaces.

Performance
Both the Yaris and the typical subcompact hatchback are likely to feel slightly slow because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio.

Handling
The typical subcompact hatchback and the Toyota Yaris have roughly comparable tires. With their similar turning radiuses, the typical subcompact hatchback and the Yaris most definitely handle approximately the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The typical subcompact hatchback's engine is markedly bigger than the Yaris's. Note that more massive engines may use more gasoline than smaller ones. Torque equals pickup, and the typical subcompact hatchback will have picked up and gone by the time the Yaris finally gets moving.

Overview
Although the basic warranty that comes with the Toyota Yaris is somewhat longer than the average subcompact hatchback's, the difference isn't too marked.

from here

Toyota Corolla vs. Toyota Yaris

Cost
Regarding MSRP, the Toyota Corolla costs considerably more than the Yaris.

Utility
Neither the Toyota Corolla nor the Toyota Yaris has a marked advantage with respect to seating capacity.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota Corolla offers a bit more head room than the Toyota Yaris, there really isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the Toyota Corolla offers a bit more head- and leg-room than the Yaris, there really isn't much of a difference.

Dimensions
The Corolla is a little more ponderous than the Toyota Yaris. Your wallet will hurt more every time you fill up the Toyota Corolla than the Toyota Yaris because of its larger tank. The Toyota Yaris and the Toyota Corolla compete for the same parking spaces.

Performance
Both the Toyota Corolla and the Toyota Yaris are likely to feel slightly slow because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio.

Handling
The Toyota Corolla has considerably bigger tires than the Yaris. Remember that wider tires could look and feel better, while smaller tires can improve gas mileage. With its tighter turning circle, the Toyota Yaris is very likely more agile than the Toyota Corolla, something to consider if you do a lot of city driving; on the other hand, remember that a vehicle with a tight turning circle may feel a bit twitchy on the highway.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Corolla has a more sizeable engine than the Toyota Yaris. Remember that smaller engines typically get better gas mileage, but smaller engines can be stressed more. Torque equals pickup, and the Toyota Corolla will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Yaris finally gets moving.

Overview
The Toyota Yaris and the Corolla have the same basic after-sale protection.

from here

Honda Civic

A redesigned eighth-generation version of Honda's smallest model went on sale for the 2006 model year. Honda calls it the most-changed Civic since the model was introduced to the U.S. market in 1973.

Five distinct models are available: Civic sedan and coupe, Civic Si sedan and coupe and Civic Hybrid sedan. In addition, approved Honda dealers in California and New York carry a Civic GX that is powered by natural gas. Powertrain choices include a high-performance 197-hp four-cylinder engine in Civic Si models and a gasoline/electric powertrain in the Civic Hybrid.

Honda promotes the Civic's safety features, including its Advanced Compatibility Engineering body structure that improves vehicle-to-vehicle crash compatibility and collision energy management. All models have side-impact and side curtain airbags, active front-seat head restraints and antilock brakes. Three Civic trim levels are available for the regular sedan and coupe: DX, LX and EX.

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the average compact coupe to the dealership as the Honda Civic. As far as gas mileage, the Honda Civic beats the typical compact coupe. The Honda Civic won't save you much money at the pump compared to the average compact coupe. Regarding MSRP, the Honda Civic costs substantially more than the typical compact coupe.

Utility
The Civic and the typical compact coupe can accommodate the same number of passengers.

Convenience
You'll quite certainly have to take the typical compact coupe for a fill-up more often than the Honda Civic because of its tank size and fuel economy.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the typical compact coupe offers a bit more head room than the Honda Civic, there really isn't much of a difference. The Honda Civic provides more head- and leg-room to your passengers than the average compact coupe does.

Dimensions
The average compact coupe is a little more ponderous than the Civic. The average compact coupe's tank is about the same size as the Honda Civic's, though the Civic's is a bit more capacious. The Honda Civic and the average compact coupe compete for the same parking spaces.

Handling
The Civic and the average compact coupe have about similar tires. With their comparable turning circles, the average compact coupe and the Honda Civic quite certainly handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Civic's engine is substantially smaller than the typical compact coupe's. Keep in mind that smaller engines can be stressed more; on the other hand, smaller engines are often cheaper to fix. Torque is the force that lets you accelerate quickly, and in this respect, the typical compact coupe is significantly more powerful than the Honda Civic.

Overview
Although the basic warranty that comes with the Honda Civic is a little longer than the average compact coupe's, the difference isn't too marked.

from here

Toyota Corolla

Few cars have a heritage as long as Toyota's popular Corolla compact sedan, which dates back to 1966 and was last redesigned for the 2003 model year. A higher hip point was supposed to ease entry.

A high-performance XRS edition joined the 2005 lineup, but was discontinued after 2006. Three other versions remain available: the value-priced CE, the upscale LE and the sporty S. An electronic stability system is optional on LE and S models with an automatic transmission.

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs about the same to get the typical compact sedan to the dealership as the Toyota Corolla. With respect to fuel economy, the Toyota Corolla beats the typical compact sedan. Producing a precise fuel economy evaluation is so difficult that some think not even the federal government can do it, but it looks as though the Corolla is the winner regarding gas mileage. The Toyota Corolla is significantly less costly than the average compact sedan as far as MSRP. The typical compact sedan will cost you a bundle in gas every year compared to the Corolla. The Toyota Corolla will save you a bunch of money at the pump every year compared to the average compact sedan.

Utility
Neither the Toyota Corolla nor the typical compact sedan has a marked advantage in terms of seating capacity.

Convenience
You'll quite certainly have to take the typical compact sedan for a fill-up more often than the Toyota Corolla because of its tank size and gas mileage. The typical compact sedan's fuel tank will need to be replenished more often than the unit in the Toyota Corolla.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Corolla offers a bit more head room than the typical compact sedan, there frankly isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the Toyota Corolla provides a bit more head- and leg-room than the typical compact sedan, there really isn't much of a difference.

Dimensions
The Toyota Corolla is likely to feel a little sluggish because of its high horsepower-to-weight ratio compared to the typical compact sedan. The Corolla's tank is roughly the same size as the typical compact sedan's, though the typical compact sedan's is slightly larger. The average compact sedan and the Toyota Corolla compete for the same parking spaces.

Performance
The Corolla is likely to feel a tad slow because of its high horsepower-to-weight ratio compared to the average compact sedan.

Handling
The typical compact sedan and the Toyota Corolla have about similar tires. With their comparable turning radiuses, the typical compact sedan and the Corolla quite certainly handle about the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Corolla's engine is substantially smaller than the average compact sedan's. Note that smaller engines can be stressed more; on the flip side, smaller engines are often cheaper to fix. Torque is the force that lets you accelerate quickly, and in this respect, the typical compact sedan is significantly more powerful than the Toyota Corolla. The Corolla could learn a lesson or two from the typical compact sedan when it comes to pickup.

Overview
The basic warranty that comes with the Toyota Corolla isn't quite as generous as the typical compact sedan's.

Other
The typical compact sedan produces fewer smog-forming pollutants per 15,000 miles than the Toyota Corolla.

from here

Toyota Sienna Overview

Toyota is back in the minivan race with an updated 268-hp V-6 powering the 2007 Sienna. That leapfrogs other minivans like the Honda Odyssey and Kia Sedona, who trumped last year's Sienna with engines pushing 250 hp.

Toyota introduced the current, second-generation Sienna minivan for 2004. Optional all-wheel drive and a refined, upscale interior are among its traits.

Siennas are available in four trim levels: CE, LE, XLE and top-of-the-line XLE Limited. All-wheel drive is available on the three upper-end models. CE and LE minivans come in seven- or eight-passenger configurations. Toyota extensively refreshed the Sienna's front end for 2006, so changes other than the upgraded engine are minor.

Honda Odyssey Overview

The 1999 - 2004 generation of Honda's front-wheel-drive Odyssey was a class leader. For 2005, the minivan received a major redesign in Honda's attempt to leapfrog the growing competition. It carries on into 2007 with minimal changes, including a tilt/telescoping steering wheel and tire pressure monitoring system for all trim levels, plus two new exterior colors.

The Odyssey has a foldaway third-row Magic Seat and a stowable PlusOne seat in the second row. Side curtain airbags protect occupants in all three rows, and an electronic stability system is standard. The windows in the sliding doors can be partially opened.

Four trim levels are offered: LX, EX, EX-L and Touring. The top two models use a Variable Cylinder Management version of Honda's 3.5-liter V-6, which shifts automatically between six- and three-cylinder operation in response to driving conditions. A regular V-6 goes into the LX and EX.

The Touring model is available with a DVD entertainment system; the system is also available in EX-L models for 2007, but only in combination with the navigation system. XM Satellite Radio is standard in Touring models, and the EX-L gets a leather-trimmed steering wheel. Odysseys are built in Alabama.

Toyota Sienna vs. Honda Odyssey

Utility
There's no clear winner between the Toyota Sienna and the Honda Odyssey with respect to transporting cargo. The Honda Odyssey will doubtless prove more convenient than the Sienna for those of you with frequent child-cargo.

Dimensions
The Honda Odyssey is a little more ponderous than the Toyota Sienna. The Toyota Sienna's tank is roughly the same size as the Odyssey's, though the Honda's is slightly more capacious. The Toyota Sienna and the Honda Odyssey compete for the same parking spaces.

Convenience
You will very likely have to visit your friendly gas station more often with the Toyota Sienna than with the Honda Odyssey.

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs approximately the same to get the Honda Odyssey to the dealership as the Sienna. With respect to fuel economy, the Honda Odyssey and the Toyota Sienna don't differ much. Producing an exact gas mileage evaluation is so tricky that some think not even the federal government can do it, but it looks as though both the Honda Odyssey and the Honda Odyssey perform approximately comparably as far as fuel economy. When it comes to MSRP, the Sienna costs considerably less than the Honda Odyssey.

Handling
The Honda Odyssey and the Sienna have about comparable tires. With their comparable turning circles, the Honda Odyssey and the Sienna most definitely handle approximately the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Sienna's engine is a tad smaller than the Honda Odyssey's, but not terribly so. The Toyota Sienna has no lessons to learn with respect to pickup from the Honda Odyssey.

Comfort
Taller drivers will quite a bit enjoy the extra head room in the Sienna's front cabin compared to the Honda Odyssey. While the rear of the Toyota Sienna offers a bit more head- and leg-room than the Honda Odyssey, there frankly isn't much of a difference.

Overview
The Honda and the Toyota Sienna have the same basic after-sale protection.


from here

Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla

Performance
Both the Honda and the Toyota Corolla are likely to feel somewhat slow because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio.

Handling
The Civic and the Toyota Corolla have approximately similar tires. With their similar turning radiuses, the Honda Civic and the Toyota Corolla definitely handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
Torque is roughly equivalent to acceleration, and in this respect, the Honda Civic isn't much more powerful than the Toyota Corolla.

Utility
The Honda Civic and the Toyota Corolla can accommodate the same number of passengers.

Comfort
Taller drivers will significantly enjoy the extra head room in the Toyota Corolla's front cabin compared to the Honda Civic. The Toyota Corolla is not particularly more spacious for your passengers than the Honda Civic.

Dimensions
The Honda Civic is a bit more ponderous than the Toyota Corolla. The Honda Civic and the Corolla compete for the same parking spaces.

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Toyota Corolla to the dealership as the Honda Civic. Regarding MSRP, the Civic costs quite a bit more than the Toyota.

Overview
The Toyota Corolla and the Honda Civic have the same basic after-sale protection.

from here

Toyota Prius i-Tech (Specification)

STD Standard Fitment
OPT Optional extra, usually available at extra cost.
Note: Option may only be available in combination with others. Refer to Dealer for details.
O/PAK Option only available in combination with others. Usually available at extra cost. Refer to Dealer for details.
D/F Dealer fit option, usually available at extra cost.
N/A Data/Specifications not available.

INSTRUMENT & CONTROLS
Power steering STD
Tilt adjustable steering wheel STD
Cruise control STD
Power exterior mirrors STD
Left hand convex mirror STD
Interior Day/Night mirror STD
Intermittent windscreen wipers STD
- Variable intermittent windscreen wipers STD
Rear washer and wiper STD
- Intermittent rear wiper STD
Headlights - Auto off STD
Digital instrument display STD
Transmission gear indicator in dash STD
Low fuel warning lamp STD

FEATURES
Air conditioning STD
- Auto/Climate control air cond. STD
Push button heater controls STD
Power windows STD
- Front and rear power windows STD
Driver's vanity mirror STD
- Illuminated drivers vanity mirror STD
Passenger's vanity mirror STD
- Illuminated passenger vanity mirror STD

DIMENSIONS
(Note: Some figures are approximate only and may vary due to options/accessories fitted.)
Length (mm) 4445
Width (mm) 1725
Height (mm) 1490
Wheelbase (mm) 2700
Ground clearance (mm) 107

STORAGE
Glovebox STD
Storage pocket/tray STD
- Sunglass holder STD
Centre console STD
Map pocket - Passenger seat STD
Map pocket - Driver's seat STD
Door pockets - Front STD
Cup holder/s STD
- Number of cup holder/s 6


SAFETY
Anti-Skid Brakes (ABS) STD
- Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD) STD
- Brake Assist (BA) STD
Traction control STD
Vehicle Stability/Swerve Control (VSC) STD
Global Outstanding Assessment body (GOA) STD
Toyota Safe-T-Cell STD
Driver's SRS airbag STD
Front passenger SRS airbag STD
Front seat side airbags STD
- Seat mounted front seat side airbags STD
- Front seat side curtain airbags STD
Rear/2nd row airbags STD
- Rear/2nd row seat side curtain airbags STD
Driver's pre-tensioner seatbelt STD
Driver's forcelimiter seatbelt STD
Front passenger pre-tensioner seatbelt STD
Front passenger forcelimiter seatbelt STD
Height adjustable front seatbelts STD
2nd row/rear seat centre position lap/sash seatbelt STD
2nd row/rear seat ALR outboard seatbelts for child seats STD
2nd row/rear seat ALR centre seatbelt for child seat STD

TYRES & RIMS
Front Tyre size 195/60 R15 88V
Rear Tyre size 195/60 R15 88V
Front Rim size 6.00JJx15
Rear Rim size 6.00JJx15
Rim type Alloy

SOUND SYSTEM
AM/FM Radio STD
CD player STD
- CD changer in cabin STD
- 6 Disc CD changer STD
Number of speaker locations (excludes speaker elements) 9
Audio controls on steering wheel STD

DRIVETRAIN
Driven Wheels Front
Transmission description Continuously Variable Transmission. Electronically controlled.

WEIGHTS & CAPACITIES
(Note: Kerb, tare & payload weights are nominal and will vary depending on options and tray/body type.)
Kerb Weight (kg) 1295-1325
Gross Vehicle Mass (kg) 1725
Maximum roof load (kg -Includes roof rack weight) N/A
Seating capacity (includes driver) 5
Luggage capacity (litres) 456
Cargo volume N/A
Fuel Tank Capacity (litres) 45
Vehicle Towing capacity - with trailer brakes (kg) Not approved
- Without trailer brakes (kg) Not approved
Genuine Towbar N/A
(Note: Genuine Towbar Capacity - Refer to Genuine Accessory Guide, as it may differ from Vehicle Towing Capacity in some circumstances.
Towing capacity - Subject to state regulations, towbar design and towing equipment.)

INTERIOR TRIM AND SEATING
Leather seat trim STD
- Full seat face leather trim STD
Leather bound steering wheel STD
Floor carpet STD
Assist grip/s STD
- Number of assist grips 4
Front bucket seats STD
Driver's seat - Manual adjustments STD
- Driver's seat single height adjustment STD
Front Passenger seat - Manual adjustments STD
Front seat head restraints STD
Second Row/Rear seat STD
- 60:40 split fold 2nd row/rear seat back STD

LIGHTING
Interior dome light/s STD
- Map light/s STD
- Front seat map light/s STD
Glovebox light STD
Luggage/cargo light STD

SECURITY
Engine immobiliser STD
Central locking / Power door locks STD
- Includes boot/tailgate unlock with central locking STD
- Remote/Keyless central locking STD
Cargo cover STD
Remote fuel lid release STD

EXTERIOR
Bodycoloured bumper/s STD
Multi-reflector headlights STD
Alloy wheels STD
- 15" alloy wheels STD
Rear spoiler STD
Rear bumper skirt STD
Metallic paint OPT
Mica paint OPT

VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS
Power accessory socket STD
Satellite navigation system STD
(Note: Satellite Navigation coverage are major capitals, primary national roads & some regional areas.)
- DVD satellite navigation system STD

BRAKES
Front Brakes Ventilated discs
Rear Brakes Discs
Anti-Skid Brakes (ABS) STD
- Electronic Brake-force Distribution STD
- Brake Assist STD
Traction Control STD
Vehicle Stability/Swerve Control (VSC) STD

WARRANTY / SERVICE
(Note: Warranties here are in addition to implied warranties under the Trade Practices Act. Conditions apply. See warranty booklet for details.)
Vehicle in years/kilometres 3yrs or 100,000kms (whichever occurs first)
Paint in years 3
Perforation in years 5

ENGINE
Engine type Petrol
Engine capacity (cc) 1497
Engine description 4cyl/DOHC/4v
Maximum Power 57kW @ 5000rpm
Maximum Torque 115Nm @ 4000rpm
(Note: Power and Torque test standards differ. Ensure comparisons use same test standard.)
Configuration In-line
Valvetrain DOHC
- Variable valve timing Timing only
Fuel system EFI
- Fuel type 91 RON ULP
Fuel economy ADR 81/01 Test standard
- Combined (L/100km) 4.4
(Note: Fuel economy varies with driving conditions/style, vehicle conditions, options and accessories.)

STEERING
Steering type Rack and pinion
Steering operation Power assisted
Turning Circle at Kerb 10.2m

SUSPENSION
Front Suspension Independent, MacPherson struts, lower L-arms, coil springs and ball-joint mounted anti-roll bar.
Rear Suspension Semi independent, torsion beam with trailing arms, strut-type coil springs, hydraulic damper units and anti-roll bar.

from here

add to del.icio.us

| digg
| reddit
| technorati

Honda Civic Hybrid

The Honda Civic Hybrid is a hybrid version of the Honda Civic sedan.

For the 2003 model of the Civic, Honda added a continuously variable transmission and an Integrated Motor Assist hybrid system similar to that of the Insight, creating a fuel efficient hybrid sedan. It is an assist hybrid. Along with the conventional Civic, it received updated styling for 2004.

It was redesigned in 2006 and based off the new Civic platform.

Technology


1st Generation (2003-2005 Model)
1.3 L i-DSI lean-burn internal-combustion engine with VTEC Cylinder Cut-off System, which allows up to three cylinders to cease operation during deceleration. This decreases friction losses generated by engine aspiration and allows more effective regeneration of energy.
15 kW (20 hp) brushless, permanent magnet assist motor, which functions as a generator during deceleration and loads (recharges) batteries
120 V Nickel-metal hydride batteries with 6.0 Ah capacity
Multimatic S continuously variable or 5-speed manual transmission (latter available only in USA)
SULEV or optional AT-PZEV certification by the California Air Resources Board (CARB)
Low rolling resistance tires and regenerative braking
Electric power-steering
Does not need to be plugged in


2nd Generation (2006-2007 Model)
Note: only advancements specified, those items remaining the same not mentioned.
4th generation IMA (Integrated Motor Assist)
1.3 L single-overhead-cam four-cylinder gas engine same as before; yet, there is now the addition of high profile camshaft. This increases power to 93 hp @ 6000 rpm
Addition of third stage of i-VTEC and VCM (Vehicle Cylinder Management) permits deactivation of all four cylinders when decelerating and constant cruising. This allows the car to run only on electric power for the first time.
EPA increase to 49 mpg city, 51 mpg highway

Awards

The Civic Hybrid's engine won the International Engine of the Year "1 litre to 1.4 litre" size category award for three years straight from 2002 through 2004 as well as the "Best Fuel Economy" category for 2003 and 2004. It has won Motor Trend 2006 Car of the Year award, along with the rest of the Civic range.
from wikipedia

add to del.icio.us

| digg
| reddit
| technorati

Toyota Prius i-Tech vs Honda Civic Hybrid

Overview

The futuristic design in the Civic Hybrid was pretty impressive to me. The Civic Hybrid's interior features beige treatment that certainly adds a nice touch to the overall appearance.

If you compare the two vehicles on features alone, then the Toyota Prius i-Tech would totally dominate the competition. The official capacity of the Toyota Pirus i-Tech is 456 liters, and the capacity of the Honda Civic Hybrid is set at 376 liters. Both cars have your basic alloy wheels. The Honda Civic Hybrid is the cheapest way to become eco-friendly with a starting price set at $31,990, which oddly enough is the same price as the Honda Civic Sport.

When you compare the two by features, the Honda Civic Hybrid undoubtedly takes second place to the Toyota Prius i-Tech. However as a hidden incentive for the eco-lovers Honda has pledged to plant 18 trees for every Civic Hybrid sold.

Details

Many are skeptical about the technology involved with Hybrids and because it isn't common yet, many just brush it off as small trend. Although they aren't often seen cruising around town, I believe this type of car is here to stay and will only be improved over time. As years pass you will be sure to see more and more of them, and eventually they may even become the norm since pollution problems are escalating at an alarming rate.

In Australia there is an extremely small market for eco-friendly cars unfortunately. In fact, there are only two well known cars that are having success in this market. They are the Toyota Prius and the Honda Civic Hybrid. They both certainly have their upsides and downfalls and when it comes down to economic fuel efficiency there is a clear cut winner. In this article, I will compare the Toyota Prius i-Tech against the Honda Civic Hybrid to see which one of these cars will come out victorious.

First off, we will discuss the interior of the vehicles. The futuristic design in the Civic Hybrid was pretty impressive to me. I like the fact that Honda wanted to take a chance and not follow the norm. One thing that Honda did maintain during design is the shape. It is the same shape as all the other Civic models, but I don't see this as a bad thing. The Civic Hybrid's interior features beige treatment that certainly adds a nice touch to the overall appearance.

Comparing the amount of space in the vehicles comes out about even in my opinion. Neither of the two are short on space and can both fit four adults in the car with ease, with no problems. The trunks are a tad short on room but this is only because that is where they both store the battery packs for the vehicles. The Toyota Prius can thank the flat battery pack that lies beneath the floor of the trunk for giving it 80 more liters of space than the Civic hybrid. The official capacity of the Toyota Pirus i-Tech is 456 liters, and the capacity of the Honda Civic Hybrid is set at 376 liters.



Now we can take a look at the Toyota Prius' interior. After seeing how impressive the Civic's interior was I was hoping to see a decent competition take off. Unfortunately, this was not the case. In comparison the Toyota Prius just couldn't compete due to its very simplistic design. The gauges and controls are either restricted to the steering wheel or confined to the touch screen LCD monitor. One thing I found rather interesting though, is that they didn't limit the steering wheel controls to audio, cruise control, and the telephone. In the Toyota Prius you are able to adjust the climate and demister controls as well, which I found to be rather remarkable. Before stepping foot in the Prius i-Tech I had never driven a vehicle that gave you the control over these features via the steering wheel. These extra features don't complicate the controls either. They are actually very easy to use and quite helpful when you are in busy traffic.

Another great feature of the Prius i-Tech is the keyless entry and keyless start system. All the driver has to do is walk up to the vehicle with the key fob in their hand or pocket, and grab the door handle. After doing this, the car simply unlocks it. Once you are inside the car all you have to do now is press the starter button from any location within the vehicle, and it starts right up. This feature was amazing to me. I enjoyed being able to just unlock my car without fumbling for the keys and starting it up in a less conventional way.

If you compare the two vehicles on features alone, then the Toyota Prius i-Tech would totally dominate the competition. On a downside though, the extra zing added by these features won't come very cheap. In fact, you will find yourself paying approximately $16,000 more than you would if you were to purchase a Honda Civic Hybrid. With a price that jumps that high from its competitors, the features on the car better be really extraordinary. Don't count the Prius out just yet though because of its price, it comes equipped with a remarkable center console LCD screen that is used to control the DVD satellite navigation. Along with managing that task the LCD screen also features a reverse camera and vehicle stats. One of the more innovative features is when the screen is showing live power statistics, which tell you how much energy you are using and how you are obtaining it. You can check the statistics to find out if you are using the engine, or electricity, or even both. I found that this feature was quite an amusing treat for me as well as informative.

Now we come down to the exterior appearance of the cars. As it did with the interior, the Honda Civic Hybrid once again wins when judged by its looks. With the eco-friendly appearance of the alloy wheels as well as the chrome highlights and hybrid badges, it was no question of why the Honda Civic claimed another victory. Toyota tried to go with something new when they designed the Prius i-Tech, but Honda stuck with the popular design of the past Civic models which gave it a nice edge on the competition. Toyota took a chance and I certainly commend them for doing so, but it unfortunately didn't work out in their favor. The one positive thing that came from the unique design of the Prius is that you know it's a hybrid car when you see it, and you are never fooled into thinking it is some other Toyota vehicle. However, the Civic Hybrid wasn't meant to deceive anyone, it was just based on the popular luxurious design on past Civics to help boost its success. Both cars have your basic alloy wheels. They look nice on both vehicles, but if you really put them side by side and look at both, you will most likely prefer the Honda to the Toyota.

Both of the vehicles are equipped with the Continually Variable Transmission (CVT), which is always a welcome feature to come across. The CVT system is used help the vehicle adjust to the driver's style.

For the Toyota Prius, you will find that the handling is much more laid back. There is an awful amount of body roll and the chassis certainly isn't up to par to that of the Honda Civic Hybrid. The steering seemed like it was a bit too power assisted for my taste. As the testing continued to move along it became apparent that the best place to drive the Prius would be in the city and not on windy or curvy roads.

The Civic Hybrid is normally ahead when it comes to taking corners and using general handling. Since it is based on the new Civic chassis there are plenty of opportunities to improve it, and continue developing it and perfecting the handling dynamics. The Civic doesn't feature any significant amounts of body roll, and is actually able to respond quickly and efficiently.

Now let's look at the prices and features and compare them. The Honda Civic Hybrid is the cheapest way to become eco-friendly with a starting price set at $31,990, which oddly enough is the same price as the Honda Civic Sport). The standard features than can be found in the Honda Civic Hybrid are as follows: cruise control, electric windows, driver and passenger side SRS airbags, alloy wheels, an immobilizer, climate control, central locking, leather wrapped steering wheel, driver and passenger front airbags, front and rear curtain airbags, Antilock Brake System (ABS) brakes, and a 6 disc changing MP3 compatible CD player.

However, the Toyota Prius i-Tech is starting at a price of $46,500, which is quite a bit more than the Civic Hybrid. The standard features that can be found on the Prius i-Tech are as follows: Power windows, climate control, dual front SRS airbags, MP3 compatible JBL audio system, Vehicle Stability Control (VSC), front fog lights, immobilizer, reverse warnings, push button start, Electric Power Steering (EPS), Antilock Brake System (ABS) brakes, Brake Assist (BA), Electronic Brake Distribution (EBD), motor traction control, DVD satellite navigation system, cruise control, alloy wheels, and many more.

One of the things that I like the most about the Honda Civic Hybrid is that they participate in the Green Fleet program, which plants trees to counteract emissions that are put out from vehicles. Honda has pledged to plant 18 trees for every Civic Hybrid sold. As an added bonus, at the end of the three years you are given the opportunity to continue participating or stop participating in the program. You shouldn't let this affect your decision though. I am a huge fan of the program, but I still think drivers should base their purchases on a number of factors to ensure that they make the right decision.

When you compare the two by features, the Honda Civic Hybrid undoubtedly takes second place to the Toyota Prius i-Tech. The quality and number of the features drastically changes between the two cars. Whether or not the price is worth it is left up to you to decide.

In conclusion, it would be great to own either of these vehicles. If you can drive a fuel efficient and eco-friendly car, then what is there to lose? After driving the hybrids I can now answer that question. You don't have anything to lose and there is actually much to gain. You don't have to be a tree hugger to take part in the prevention of world pollution. And even if you are so worried about the environment, you can still at least enjoy the benefits of a much more fuel efficient breed of cars than any others on the market.

from here

add to del.icio.us

| digg
| reddit
| technorati